Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:03:38 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Michael Clark <MClark@Nemschoff.com> Cc: 'Kris Kennaway' <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: kernel Message-ID: <20040211180336.GA66444@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <A2A28DB6D52E084783ACD6E6C6F5D790B43EFE@EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com> References: <A2A28DB6D52E084783ACD6E6C6F5D790B43EFE@EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 08:10:45AM -0600, Michael Clark wrote: > Isn't ISA Support almost always needed on i386?? > I thought some non ISA devices actually make use of this... That was my first guess, but the immediate problem is what I said below. Kris P.S. Please don't top-post. --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAKm54Wry0BWjoQKURAj4fAJ9w+fDPZICJSzAzQDrVu7ceGcqVMQCbBavF UDUU3gxNqyoyULFpQgoqADc= =/d89 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040211180336.GA66444>