Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 11:35:43 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: ertr1013@student.uu.se Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu Subject: Re: POSIX_C_SOURCE Message-ID: <20030831.113543.12223209.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20030830171343.GA33800@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> References: <20030830161813.GA28890@twisted.net> <200308301649.h7UGnF5H042361@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20030830171343.GA33800@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20030830171343.GA33800@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>
Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> writes:
: /* Deal with IEEE Std. 1003.1-1990, in which _POSIX_C_SOURCE == 1. */
: #if _POSIX_C_SOURCE == 1
: #undef _POSIX_C_SOURCE /* Probably illegal, but beyond caring now. */
: @@ -280,6 +282,8 @@
: #undef _POSIX_C_SOURCE
: #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 199209
: #endif
That's 100% legal and should *NOT* produce a warning. Garrett is
right.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030831.113543.12223209.imp>