Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:06:53 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel dev_t elimination patch for review Message-ID: <71616.1086962813@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 11 Jun 2004 08:52:29 EDT." <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040611084726.64565D-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040611084726.64565D-100000@fledge.watson.org>, Robe rt Watson writes: >It looks reasonable to me, although bde will no doubt point out there are >a couple of places where function declarations get too long for a line, >comments don't line up, etc. He already did :-) >Do you plan to eliminate udev_t in a following step and return it to >dev_t? There are some positive and negative aspecets of doing so relating >to cross-platform compatibility, one suspects, but it would be nice for >consistency purposes now that the kernel dev_t is gone. Yes, that is the second half of this change. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?71616.1086962813>