Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 20:27:00 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: dfr@nlsystems.com, tomdean@ix.netcom.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Draft manpages available for review Message-ID: <199806291027.UAA20289@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>I didn't bother with a 'Return Values' section for functions which were
>void or where the return value was described in the 'Description' section.
Perhaps the 'Description' section shouldn't say much about return values.
>> devclass - /usr/include/sys/device.h contains enum devclass { ... }
>
>What I really want to to is 'cvs rm -f sys/device.h' :-). The concepts
>there are not compatible with the new framework.
It is only used by ccd.c and subr_autoconf.c. You can start by
unstandardiz^Hsing subr_autoconf.c, which seems to be completely unused
(it's not used by LINT) although only half of it is `#ifdef UNUSED'.
>> devclass_add_driver - ispell says 'initialisation' should be 'initialization'
>
>Do we have any convention in our manpages for which dialect of English
>spelling to use?
Native.
Bruce
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806291027.UAA20289>