Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:02:44 +0200
From:      "Jon Otterholm" <jon.otterholm@ide.resurscentrum.se>
To:        <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   SV: Dummynet
Message-ID:  <C44C550808114E4B9F4CF3FCA16F10A101019598@edusrv05.edu.irc.local>
References:  <C44C550808114E4B9F4CF3FCA16F10A1010194D8@edusrv05.edu.irc.local> <slrni9hab2.27na.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Vadim!

> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Fr=E5n: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> stable@freebsd.org] F=F6r Vadim Goncharov
> Skickat: den 21 september 2010 14:48
> Till: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> =C4mne: Re: Dummynet
>=20
> Hi Jon Otterholm!
>=20
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:00:48 +0200; Jon Otterholm wrote about
> 'Dummynet':
>=20
> > Installed a new router running 8-stable and encounter some problems
> > when configuring dummynet pipes:
>=20
> > When setting buckets above 1024...
> > ipfw pipe 91 config bw 100Mbit/s mask src-ip 0xffffffff buckets 4096
>=20
> > ...I get the following error:
> > Clamp sched buckets to 1024 (was 4096)
>=20
> Try to write "buckets 4096" before "mask", though this is unlikely to =
help,
> there are some troubles with 8.1's changes in parser.

Didn't help.=20

>=20
> > # sysctl net.inet.ip.dummynet.hash_size
> > net.inet.ip.dummynet.hash_size: 4096
>=20
> Also, make sure you're doing this before any packets actually went to
> dummynet (e.g. just after reboot).

This is set in /etc/sysctl.conf ...

>=20
> > from man ipfw:
> >     buckets hash-table-size
> >           Specifies the size of the hash table used for storing the
> > various
> >           queues.  Default value is 64 controlled by the sysctl(8)
> > variable
> >           net.inet.ip.dummynet.hash_size, allowed range is 16 to =
65536.
>=20
> > Am I missing something here? This worked fine in the 7-branch.
>=20
> The reason is that luigi@ merged ipfw3 from -CURRENT between 8.0R and
> 8.1R.
> There are many new features and, as seen from many PRs, many new bugs.

OK. I just have to wait then for luigi@ to submit fixes.

Thanks for the tips and info.

Should I expect and be prepared for any other flaws from the current =
version of dummynet in 8-STABLE?

//JO



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C44C550808114E4B9F4CF3FCA16F10A101019598>