Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:47:29 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bpf kernel module Message-ID: <20061115124729.e4alqrgs0o8kow8w@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <455A16AF.5040200@u.washington.edu> References: <200611141435.kAEEZqFr036308@lurza.secnetix.de> <455A16AF.5040200@u.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> (from Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:19:11 -0800): > Something else I should have mentioned. Statically building components > into the kernel makes operation faster overall, but increases the > required memory for your machine, whereas using modules is more > expensive time-wise, but you can load portions of the kernel piece by > piece, instead of load the entire kernel into main memory. As Oliver How did you measure/tested this and what are the numbers? Bye, Alexander. -- Each of us bears his own Hell. -- Publius Vergilius Maro (Virgil) http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061115124729.e4alqrgs0o8kow8w>