Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:02:34 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ian Moore <imoore@picknowl.com.au> Cc: bsd-questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Suggestion re packages Message-ID: <20021003190234.GC3372@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200210031306.17102.imoore@picknowl.com.au> References: <200210031306.17102.imoore@picknowl.com.au>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 01:06:17PM +0930, Ian Moore wrote: > Hi, > As I was browsing thru the questions mailing list just now, I thought of > something that might improve the ease of use of our ports/packages system. > It seems to me it would be helpful if packages included a quick summary of any > options used to compile the package and anything else that isn't included in > the packages, but is present in the port (or vice versa?). For example - the > authentication bits in Squid) Packages are only ever built with the default options (i.e. no special options enabled/disabled). Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9nJRKWry0BWjoQKURAk1RAKDtT7pPSTj9CRfp0AtsBTsTmUh3PQCg+Xwf mbABbfCSUI0wpiqIJojQUAY= =eogC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021003190234.GC3372>