Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:08:02 -0400 From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> To: Dag-Erling =?unknown-8bit?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Message-ID: <20040624160802.GL5850@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> In-Reply-To: <xzp7jtxndsb.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <20040624151926.6D24B7303F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20040624154254.GA67041@ip.net.ua> <xzp7jtxndsb.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 06:04:04PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> writes:
> > It would be interesting to know, if it's only a cross build that's broken,
> > or native SPARC64 build is broken too?
>
> I'll start a native build, but it will take some time to complete.
>
I did one yesterday that worked.
I had turned off panther's (cluster ref machine) daily cron rebuild/reboot
when the initial binutils import happened because of loader problems. But
that got resolved and I forgot to turn it back on, I'll do that now.
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040624160802.GL5850>