Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 08:05:02 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> To: ports@FreeBSD.org, koziol@hdfgroup.org Cc: "maho@FreeBSD.org" <maho@FreeBSD.org>, thierry@FreeBSD.org Subject: Why so many versions of the port science/hdf? Message-ID: <4DC937FE.7090602@missouri.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Why are there three versions of science/hdf in the ports? This is causing problems for me when I try to build the port octave-forge. As dependencies, it calls in the octave port (which currently defaults to hdf5), the cgnslib port (which uses hdf5-18), and the opendx port (which uses hdf). All of these ports function perfectly well with hdf5.18, because all the different versions of hdf conflict with each other. If we could settle on using hdf5-18 throughout, that would be great. (I currently maintain opendx, so that would be something I can fix.) Are there ports that need hdf but don't build with hdf5-18? Thanks, Stephen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DC937FE.7090602>