Date: 12 Mar 1999 19:18:13 +0100 From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: Fernando Schapachnik <fpscha@ns1.sminter.com.ar>, robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org, dillon@apollo.backplane.com, andrewr@slack.net, archie@whistle.com, andrew@squiz.co.nz, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: disapointing security architecture Message-ID: <amww0mh8re.fsf@hummel.e.kth.se> In-Reply-To: Wes Peters's message of Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:05:10 -0700 References: <199903121509.MAA19155@ns1.sminter.com.ar> <36E94946.5DFC60DF@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> writes: > Fernando Schapachnik wrote: > > > > > The Solaris folk now appear to have ACL support in the base OS install + > > > FS. Where did they find the space to store the ACLs? Adding any more > > > > I think they store it sacrificing 3rd. level indirection, but I'm not sure. > [...] > Nope, it doesn't look like the ACL information is referenced in the > disk inode. They must store it somewhere else on the volume. Weird. They store it in the shadow inode. Love To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?amww0mh8re.fsf>