Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 12:54:02 +0100 From: "Max" <max@ecotech.com.lr> To: <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org> Subject: Orinoco Ap-500 or OR-500? Message-ID: <000e01c236f6$a27ad990$04ef10ac@wireless>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] I am look for a solution for my remote stations. I have a wireless backbone beaming across the clients and they have their lans already in place. My task is to connect their lans to the backbone wirelessly. My question is: what's the best choice (efficiency and cost-wise) for connectiing them? Do I use a Orinoco AP-500 or OR-500? Formerly i was using a gateway machine Win2000 Server/Win2K Pro and WinXP. Thanks Max [-- Attachment #2 --] <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><FONT size=2> <P>I am look for a solution for my remote stations. I have a wireless backbone beaming across the clients and they have their lans already in place. My task is to connect their lans to the backbone wirelessly. My question is: what's the best choice (efficiency and cost-wise) for connectiing them? Do I use a Orinoco AP-500 or OR-500? Formerly i was using a gateway machine Win2000 Server/Win2K Pro and WinXP.</P> <P>Thanks</P> <P>Max</P></FONT></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000e01c236f6$a27ad990$04ef10ac>