Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 12:21:03 +0700 From: Erich Dollansky <erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: November 5th is Clang-Day Message-ID: <20121102122103.4afc93e5@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <20121102045917.GA77204@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20121102032945.GF65074@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20121102045917.GA77204@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:59:17 -0700 Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:29:45PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > - Not all libm tests pass. More work by subject matter experts is > > required to create tests cases for LLVM developers. Most > > problems are not expected to be major in practice given that LLVM > > is being used for scientific computing in a number of products > > including Cray's FORTRAN compiler, most OpenCL compilers, and the > > Julia language. > > Is there a knob to continue to use GCC as the default compiler? > > The above statement is somewhat troubling to those of us > who use FreeBSD as computational nodes. > > BTW, the name of the language is "Fortran". It's been "Fortran" > for the last 30-something years. I never realised the name change. It seems that I am not alone with this. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121102122103.4afc93e5>