Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:42:38 +0100 (CET) From: Andre Rein <ar@g23.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: different traffic accounting trafd vs. ipcad Message-ID: <20040224152136.S97179@juergen.edv-winter.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi ML, I'm running two different accounting programs at the firewall (ipcad & trafd) and it looks like that trafd doesn't account the whole traffic, because the sum of the individual tcp/udp/icmp traffic doesn't match the ipcad accounting. There are differences in between 0-50 MB a day. One time trafd accounts more outgoing traffic than ipcad but the incoming is much lesser. If I compare the accounting from our local provider with the ipcad traffic I get nearly the same results. So it must be trafd or a wrong config i did. So my question, does anybody run into the same trouble with trafd and solved it or is there any other Software wich can count port based traffic and is more documented and tested? here some network/trafd related stuff: processes: /bin/trafd -r -O -i fxp0 /sbin/natd -l -a 195.226.65.125 -unregistered_only nic's: fxp0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.55.74 netmask 0xfffffffc broadcast 192.168.55.75 inet6 fe80::260:b0ff:fe67:e801%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 ether 00:60:b0:67:e8:01 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) status: active fxp1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 195.226.65.125 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 195.226.65.127 inet6 fe80::290:27ff:fe22:b7e8%fxp1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 ether 00:90:27:22:b7:e8 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) status: active Routing tables: Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 192.168.55.73 UGSc 28 96501173 fxp0 ...... kind regards -- "And some greetings from the Toaster"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040224152136.S97179>