Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 13:12:12 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@altavista.net> To: Chris Piazza <cpiazza@jaxon.net> Cc: "Vanilla I. Shu" <vanilla@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/sdl Makefile ports/devel/sdl/patchespatch-ag ports/devel/sdl/pkg PLIST Message-ID: <3902CC7C.4EE2D1E1@altavista.net> References: <200004222125.OAA42966@freefall.freebsd.org> <39029708.7FD162B8@altavista.net> <20000423002946.A3704@norn.ca.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris Piazza wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 09:24:08AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > "Vanilla I. Shu" wrote: > > > > > vanilla 2000/04/22 14:25:58 PDT > > > > > > Modified files: > > > devel/sdl Makefile > > > devel/sdl/pkg PLIST > > > Added files: > > > devel/sdl/patches patch-ag > > > Log: > > > Ignore release version of libSDL. (libSDL-1.0 => libSDL) > > > > Not approved by: Maintainer > > > > There is sdl-devel port in my queue, so please revert those changes > > since we will have to distinguish SDL 1.0 and SDL 1.1 somehow. > > Like we do with everything else, bump the major number. Of course > we have to ask if it's not worth just upgrading sdl to the devel > version right out anyway. It seems some things coming out require SDL > 1.1+ (ie smpeg 0.3.5). I'd preffer to have it in gtkXX way, so the SDL1.0 and SDL1.1 will be able to coexist on the same machine. The reason for that is clear: SDL1.1 is unstable development version, so it should be used only for those apps (e.g. smpeg) which really need it. All others should use SDL1.0. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3902CC7C.4EE2D1E1>