Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:11:03 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>, wblock@wonkity.com Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: Profiling and merging for the print edition Message-ID: <51C32997.4060402@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130621.005500.1354772635358785822.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1306171145490.79915@wonkity.com> <20130621.005500.1354772635358785822.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Em 20-06-2013 17:55, Hiroki Sato escreveu: > wb> After applying the patch, build either the online or print version of > wb> the book with: > wb> > wb> make EDITION=online clean book.html > wb> make EDITION=print clean book.html > wb> > wb> The "online" version includes all sections with edition="online" or an > wb> edition not set. > > Please do not add a separate make variable for that. We already have > FORMATS, and setting profiling variables (profile.attribute and > profile.value in XSLT) based on it should work. > > Also, we should consider/discuss what kind of difference we need > actually and should allow between the two first. Basically I am > against marking up everything with "online" or "print" because it > just makes the source files complicated. I think it is useful only > for separating lengthy preface, edition history, and pgpkey list from > the body in book.xml. I believe that XHTML is an online format by nature but pdf may also be distributed as an online snapshot after the actual release so I would also treat them separated as Warner suggests. Gabor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51C32997.4060402>