Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 21:12:24 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: "Tyson N. Trebesch" <trebesch@mcn.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A note about fsck Message-ID: <20000814211224.V4854@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008142142170.77682-100000@mazer.mcn.net>; from trebesch@mcn.net on Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 09:48:55PM -0600 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008142142170.77682-100000@mazer.mcn.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Tyson N. Trebesch <trebesch@mcn.net> [000814 21:00] wrote: > > In general, it is a good idea to use fsck on the raw device and not the > block device when you're interested in fixing the filesystem. That is, > > fsck /dev/rad0s1a > > is probably better than > > fsck /dev/ad0s1a > > given inconsistencies that arise between the block device and the buffer > cache. Actually afaik FreeBSD doesn't support block devices anymore since 4.0. :) -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000814211224.V4854>