Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:56:01 -0500 From: Lawrence Sica <lomion@mac.com> To: Viktor Lazlo <viktorlazlo@telus.net> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCO Lawsuits, round 2 Message-ID: <29E59287-1ADB-11D8-9E07-000393A335A2@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20031119133124.A3269@d66-183-123-52.bchsia.telus.net> References: <23740.216.195.235.103.1069277586.squirrel@webmail.gigguardian.com> <99E31C70-1AD6-11D8-9E07-000393A335A2@mac.com> <20031119133124.A3269@d66-183-123-52.bchsia.telus.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 19, 2003, at 4:51 PM, Viktor Lazlo wrote: > > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lawrence Sica wrote: > >> >> On Nov 19, 2003, at 4:33 PM, Chip McClure wrote: >> >>> Anyone happen to have a look at Slashdot recently? Happen to wander >>> across >>> an article on the next round of lawsuits, targetting the BSD >>> community. >>> >>> IMO, SCO's grabbing at straws, and they're sinking fast. >>> >>> http://www.newsforge.com/business/03/11/18/1742216.shtml? >>> tid=2&tid=82&tid=85&tid=94 >>> >>> >> I'm no lawyer, but I don't see how much hope SCO has. The lawsuit was >> settled and alll... > > Settled out of court though, which means there was no legal resolution, > giving them some potential, although unlikely, room for leverage. > IIRC the settlement has to be approved by a judge. --Larry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?29E59287-1ADB-11D8-9E07-000393A335A2>