Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 12:50:27 GMT From: Watanabe Kazuhiro <CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/67078: [patch] MFC of a rtld(1) man page is incomplete. Message-ID: <200406091250.i59CoRrT002528@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/67078; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Watanabe Kazuhiro <CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp> To: bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: George Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> Subject: Re: docs/67078: [patch] MFC of a rtld(1) man page is incomplete. Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 21:41:37 +0900 At Tue, 8 Jun 2004 12:17:36 +0300, George Keramidas wrote: > Shouldn't LD_LIBRARY_PATH be indented with .It too below? (snip) > By looking at the rest of the .Ev entries, I think the correct change > would just add an .It before ".Ev LD_LIBRARY_PATH". I don't think so. Because in the -current's rtld(1) man page, this part is described as below: | .It Ev LD_PRELOAD | A list of shared libraries, separated by colons and/or white space, | to be linked in before any | other shared libraries. | If the directory is not specified then | the directories specified by | .Ev LD_LIBRARY_PATH | will be searched first | followed by the set of built-in standard directories. | This is ignored for set-user-ID and set-group-ID programs. > The LD_xxx > environment vars seems to be alphabetically sorted, so moving > LD_LIBMAP_DISABLE *after* LD_LIBRARY_PATH would break the sorting. If we adjust the man page to the -current's one, LD_LIBMAP_DISABLE should be placed before LD_PRELOAD (and my patch is wrong). --- Watanabe Kazuhiro (CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406091250.i59CoRrT002528>