Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 15:30:19 +0300 From: "Artem Koutchine" <matrix@ipform.ru> To: "Vladimir Mencl, MK, susSED" <mencl@nenya.ms.mff.cuni.cz>, "David Talkington" <dtalk@prairienet.org> Cc: "Chuck Rock" <carock@epconline.net>, <security@FreeBSD.ORG>, <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: What anti-sniffer measures do i have? Message-ID: <007001c06a80$9fac4800$0c00a8c0@ipform.ru> References: <Pine.GSO.4.31.0012201319320.1889-100000@nenya.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
N/A for windows. Only for UNIX. So, not usable in heterogenic networks. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vladimir Mencl, MK, susSED" <mencl@nenya.ms.mff.cuni.cz> To: "David Talkington" <dtalk@prairienet.org> Cc: "Chuck Rock" <carock@epconline.net>; <security@FreeBSD.ORG>; <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 3:23 PM Subject: RE: What anti-sniffer measures do i have? > On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, David Talkington wrote: > > > Far as I know, hard-coding an arp table is the only way to prevent > > that sort of thing ... someone please correct me if I'm wrong? > > Hardcoding the ARP table both in the switch and in every computer "to be > protected" in the network. Every computer would have to know both IP and > ethernet address of at least the router, the nameserver and all > computers it connects to. > > Will it be enough? > > ...putting the switch into a mode like "use only-and-only this hardcoded > arp-table".... > > > > Vladimir Mencl > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?007001c06a80$9fac4800$0c00a8c0>