Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:39:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com> To: n_hibma@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: nsayer@quack.kfu.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: hid_report_size() prototype wrong in both -stable and -current Message-ID: <1087.207.5.33.65.987532780.squirrel@medusa.kfu.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0104171815120.85224-100000@henny.webweaving.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0104171815120.85224-100000@henny.webweaving.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > usb.h != libusb.h > > NetBSD has a stupid naming convention. Use libusb.h in FreeBSD. Ok. That's as may be, but then why are there prototypes for libusb calls in dev/usb.h? > > The prototypes are correct as is. They may be in libusb.h, but the prototype for that function in sys/dev/usb.h is mysterious. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1087.207.5.33.65.987532780.squirrel>