Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 00:45:11 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How much security should ldconfig enforce? Message-ID: <20000727004510.S17222@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.000726193613.jdp@polstra.com>; from jdp@polstra.com on Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 07:36:13PM -0700 References: <XFMail.000726193613.jdp@polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> [000726 19:36] wrote: > > 3. It could default to strictly secure but accept a command-line > option to relax the constraints. And an rc.conf knob could be added > to control whether or not it was strict at boot time. > > What do you folks think about this? I think this sounds the best, it protects our users but also allows them the flexibility they may need. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000727004510.S17222>