Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 12:22:05 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu> To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, phiber@udel.edu, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Celeron and Celeron ( Mendocino ) kernel patch. Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95q.990109122113.9373A-100000@rac7.wam.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <13814.915901303@verdi.nethelp.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 9 Jan 1999 sthaug@nethelp.no wrote: > > I wasn't disagreeing with that, I was just saying what I said about the > > cache. Intel would have you believe that there is not any cache on the > > Celeron. > > There are different Celeron models. The new models (300A, 333A etc.) have > 128 kB L2 cache on the chip. The old (non-A) models *do not* have any L2 > cache. Oh, sorry to bother about that then. I don't follow intel too closely, since I am eagerly waiting for the AMD K7 to arrive. Kenneth culver To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.95q.990109122113.9373A-100000>