Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:54:58 +0000 From: "davide (Davide Italiano)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D1809: [sockbuf] Don't expose lock details when isn't needed Message-ID: <2985078bfa16e89f498437d6492a2d65@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-itcsjouioqxprcrqy7hw-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-itcsjouioqxprcrqy7hw-req@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
davide added a comment. Robert, an added (somewhat related) note. SCTP has already its own sockbuf(s) and this makes integration very hackish in the tree. IIRC glebius experienced this himself while working on sendfile(), and I'm pretty sure rrs@ is kind of familiar with the problem. Introducing a better abstraction for sockbuf might help with this. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1809 To: davide, kmacy, np, rrs, lstewart, rwatson Cc: julian, freebsd-net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2985078bfa16e89f498437d6492a2d65>