Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:12:58 +0100 From: Paolo Pisati <piso@freebsd.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: perforce@freebsd.org, piso@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 115279 for review Message-ID: <20070305111258.GA1501@tin.it> In-Reply-To: <20070303.135040.179932401.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <200703031614.l23GE0QR013965@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070303.135040.179932401.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:50:40PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > I think we should re-evaluate how CSC interrupts are handled for > CardBus and PC Card in general, which might simplify things in this > area of the code. It was originally put into place to handle sudden, > surprise removal of the cards in a (mostly) sane way. Now that the > underlying reasons for having these checks are gone, it would make > things better if this could be investigated... I'll have to add it to > my list... If you have any suggestion to simplify the code, i'm all ears. bye, P.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070305111258.GA1501>