Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 23:55:37 +0000 From: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "andreas.nagy@frequentis.com" <andreas.nagy@frequentis.com> Subject: Re: NFSv4.1 server deficiencies fixed for ESXi client Message-ID: <YTOPR0101MB095318BC999B799A8136D9ECDD5E0@YTOPR0101MB0953.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> In-Reply-To: <YTOPR0101MB0953689C53C8B6B9715400E5DD5E0@YTOPR0101MB0953.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> References: <YTOPR0101MB0953EACBFD7354D0CAA44C8EDD720@YTOPR0101MB0953.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>, <201806171442.w5HEg3pB060542@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>, <YTOPR0101MB0953689C53C8B6B9715400E5DD5E0@YTOPR0101MB0953.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
I wrote: > (I am going to look and see what the Linux server does for this case.) I just looked and the Linux 4.17-rc2 kernel NFS server just returns NFS_OK for the rca_one_fs == TRUE case. I have given a patch that does the same thing for the FreeBSD server to Andreas and Daniel and think it is ok to commit, if it works. (I don't think it violates the RFC, since the RFC is vague w.r.t. when the rca_one_fs == TRUE case is used and never mentions that an error should be returned when the server doesn't use it. rickhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YTOPR0101MB095318BC999B799A8136D9ECDD5E0>