Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 12:10:57 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au> To: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ccc vs. libtool Message-ID: <20010321121057.S26138@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> In-Reply-To: <998i08$voq$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>; from naddy@mips.inka.de on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 09:27:36PM %2B0000 References: <998i08$voq$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2001-Mar-20 21:27:36 +0000, Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote: >1. Position-independent code? > >What's the situation regarding PIC on alpha? My impression from the Alpha documentation is that Alpha code is PIC by default, hence there's no explicit PIC option. >2. Detecting ccc? > >In order to properly patch libtool, I need to detect that the >compiler is ccc. I'd hate to do this by name only. Is there an >equivalent to gcc's __GNUC__ define? According the Compaq CC on Tru64, __DECC works. [BTW: gcc may be slow and generate bad code, but it provides a far more useful set of warnings than ccc]. Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010321121057.S26138>