Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:43:09 +0100 From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: John Almberg <jalmberg@identry.com> Subject: Re: snmpd strangeness Message-ID: <200811192043.10760.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <E75530E4-DD9E-4002-B7D0-BBF98EF02208@identry.com> References: <BFDB04F6-6032-4CBE-859A-CB2BEE3A4C4E@identry.com> <20081119185829.GA4786@icarus.home.lan> <E75530E4-DD9E-4002-B7D0-BBF98EF02208@identry.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 20:37:05 John Almberg wrote: > >> This machine has an Intel motherboard and a hardware raid controller. > >> From what I can tell, there is some Intel software installed on the > >> machine that makes hardware faults visible to snmp. > > > > That would require Net-SNMP to be linked to that software (or library) > > directly. Two things can't just "magically talk" to one another. :-) > > As I said, I really have no idea. > > Now that I'm reading more deeply in the notes... the monitoring was > supposed to be with IPMI. No idea what that is, either, but I thought > I'd toss it into the mix. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_Platform_Management_Interface -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200811192043.10760.fbsd.questions>