Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 07:45:26 -0600 From: Peter Schultz <pmes@bis.midco.net> To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: branches [was: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/firefox Makefile distinfo patch-build_unix_run-mozilla] Message-ID: <402B8376.7060206@bis.midco.net> In-Reply-To: <402B7AFA.8040606@mindspring.com> References: <200402110716.i1B7GH9D017803@repoman.freebsd.org> <xzpisidbtvn.fsf@dwp.des.no> <1076508074.88428.14.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20040211122704.X93022@blues.jpj.net> <xzpk72tiah1.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040211165940.Q98525@blues.jpj.net> <xzp4qtweqlf.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040212031228.E31447@blues.jpj.net> <20040212102842.GC3148@FreeBSD.org> <402B7AFA.8040606@mindspring.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Are there stable and current branches of the ports tree? I wouldn't think so, because then I don't think there'd have to be such a critical ports freeze. Having a better audited ports tree would be nice, like the other day when on of nectar's security patches to gaim got blown away. Pete...home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?402B8376.7060206>