Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:29:10 +0200 From: "Ronald Klop" <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org> To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r214199 - stable/8 Message-ID: <op.vk202wgb8527sy@pinky> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1010231104040.95624@fledge.watson.org> References: <201010220846.o9M8kMEo020056@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1010231104040.95624@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 12:05:00 +0200, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> +20101022: >> + A workaround for a fixed ld bug has been removed in kernel code, >> + so make sure that your system ld is built from sources after >> + revision 211583 (r210245 if building stable/8 kernel on head, >> + r211584 for stable/7). A symptom of incorrect ld version is >> + different addresses for set_pcpu section and __start_set_pcpu >> + symbol in kernel and/or modules. > > Since many of our users still rely on cvsup to update FreeBSD source, it > might be useful to provide rough date thresholds for the branches in > addition to the Subversion changeset numbers (which are less easy to > deal with when checking out with cvsup/cvs). > > Thanks! > > Robert As a non-freebsd developer is there an advantage to do svn checkout in stead of c(v)sup? Ronald.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.vk202wgb8527sy>