Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:20:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/52790: New port: shells/bash-completion Message-ID: <200306052020.h55KKDhM083820@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/52790; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/52790: New port: shells/bash-completion Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:17:05 -0500 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2003-06-04T14:36:19Z, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> writes: > I'v fixed patch-aa, added depends on shell/bash2, fixed pkg-message > and tested. Regarding the corrupted archive: Thanks for fixing that. It worked correctly on my system before using the "shar" command to create the archive, but I don't know enough about that command to get it to do the right thing. Regarding the shells/bash2 dependency: Should it be dependent on bash2? While I agree that it's mostly useless without bash2, isn't there a possibility that it could be regarded as documentation, or used with a Linux bash from one of the linux_base installations? Regarding the pkg-message: I tried to copy-and-paste from the pkg-message files from other ports that were apparently done incorrectly. Thanks for putting me on the right track. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+36VE5sRg+Y0CpvERAsVIAKCePyqm6LNvxU5UHSLjUahrOq9myQCgj+vK Z09XPytyRGYGs7UYFU4gc1o= =w0dW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200306052020.h55KKDhM083820>