Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:07:29 +1030 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: David Scheidt <dscheidt@enteract.com> Cc: "Michael C . Wu" <keichii@iteration.net>, Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Mobile phone coverage (was: VCD (was Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata atapi-cd.c)) Message-ID: <20010122150729.S3066@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101212221400.55216-100000@shell-2.enteract.com>; from dscheidt@enteract.com on Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 10:35:15PM -0600 References: <20010122135650.Q3066@wantadilla.lemis.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101212221400.55216-100000@shell-2.enteract.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, 21 January 2001 at 22:35:15 -0600, David Scheidt wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Greg Lehey wrote: > >> I've been looking at web pages, and it doesn't sound to me that 3G is >> a new transmission technology, just something that climbs on the back >> of one. Is there any reason why it should be tied to CDMA and not to >> GSM? > > Yes. CDMA has much better use of bandwidth. That's not a reason why 3G can't work on GSM. > All users of a CDMA channel use it simultanously, not time > multiplexed. Well, there are bandwidth considerations anyway. There's just less waste. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010122150729.S3066>