Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 2 Dec 2022 16:04:05 -0800
From:      Rick Macklem <rick.macklem@gmail.com>
To:        Olivier Certner <olivier.freebsd@free.fr>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: nfsd in a vnet jail
Message-ID:  <CAM5tNy63yE%2BL0rjfdYSs_WVwh3_gi8fmRVNiTu9BEKzNj_iYgA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8351812.Gc231LQI4k@ravel>
References:  <CAM5tNy7CQaBTRWG0m0aN6T0xG2L2zSQJGa%2BatGaH%2BmW%2BwEpdyQ@mail.gmail.com> <1955021.aDjkhKmpDe@ravel> <CAM5tNy5a9GYjJcjXLQvsjF77Gsu6yej5XR=mMTAuVKWxoNfR1A@mail.gmail.com> <8351812.Gc231LQI4k@ravel>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--000000000000f03aeb05eee131b9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I think this is worthy of third party testing now.
See https://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/nfsd-vnet-prison-setup.txt

I still haven't tried NFSv3 and I have not ported nfsuserd into the vnet,
but most NFSv4 setups don't need it anyhow.

Good luck with it if you test it, rick
ps: Just replied to a random post for this.


On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 7:41 AM Olivier Certner <olivier.freebsd@free.fr>
wrote:

> > To enforce it for cases where mountd/nfsd is not being run would
> > definitely be a POLA violation.
>
> I could not agree more.
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
>
> --
> Olivier Certner
>
>
>
>

--000000000000f03aeb05eee131b9
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:monospac=
e">I think this is worthy of third party testing now.</div><div class=3D"gm=
ail_default" style=3D"font-family:monospace">See <a href=3D"https://people.=
freebsd.org/~rmacklem/nfsd-vnet-prison-setup.txt">https://people.freebsd.or=
g/~rmacklem/nfsd-vnet-prison-setup.txt</a></div><div class=3D"gmail_default=
" style=3D"font-family:monospace"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_default" st=
yle=3D"font-family:monospace">I still haven&#39;t tried NFSv3 and I have no=
t ported nfsuserd into the vnet,</div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D=
"font-family:monospace">but most NFSv4 setups don&#39;t need it anyhow.</di=
v><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:monospace"><br></div><d=
iv class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:monospace">Good luck with i=
t if you test it, rick</div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-fami=
ly:monospace">ps: Just replied to a random post for this.</div><div class=
=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:monospace"></div><div class=3D"gmai=
l_default" style=3D"font-family:monospace"><br></div></div><br><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 =
at 7:41 AM Olivier Certner &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:olivier.freebsd@free.fr">o=
livier.freebsd@free.fr</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_q=
uote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,2=
04);padding-left:1ex">&gt; To enforce it for cases where mountd/nfsd is not=
 being run would<br>
&gt; definitely be a POLA violation.<br>
<br>
I could not agree more.<br>
<br>
Thanks for the clarification.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Olivier Certner<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>

--000000000000f03aeb05eee131b9--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAM5tNy63yE%2BL0rjfdYSs_WVwh3_gi8fmRVNiTu9BEKzNj_iYgA>