Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 5 Feb 2024 11:41:48 GMT
From:      Richard Scheffenegger <rscheff@FreeBSD.org>
To:        src-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-branches@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   git: 9bc48382a5e8 - stable/14 - tcp: move cc_post_recovery past snd_una update
Message-ID:  <202402051141.415Bfmuw075444@gitrepo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The branch stable/14 has been updated by rscheff:

URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=9bc48382a5e8260b3240b4cd99d984ada55f0990

commit 9bc48382a5e8260b3240b4cd99d984ada55f0990
Author:     Richard Scheffenegger <rscheff@FreeBSD.org>
AuthorDate: 2024-01-27 23:16:59 +0000
Commit:     Richard Scheffenegger <rscheff@FreeBSD.org>
CommitDate: 2024-02-01 18:13:53 +0000

    tcp: move cc_post_recovery past snd_una update
    
    The RFC6675 pipe calculation (sack.revised, enabled
    by default since D28702), uses outdated information,
    while the previous default calculated it correctly
    with up-to-date information from the incoming ACK.
    
    This difference can become as large as the receive
    window (not the congestion window previously),
    potentially triggering a massive burst of new packets.
    
    MFC after:             1 week
    Reviewed By:           tuexen, #transport
    Sponsored by:          NetApp, Inc.
    Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43520
    
    (cherry picked from commit 0b3f9e435f2bde9e5be27030d9f574a977a1ad47)
---
 sys/netinet/tcp_input.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c b/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c
index 38498370ceb2..2a4f3875d1b9 100644
--- a/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c
+++ b/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c
@@ -478,13 +478,12 @@ cc_post_recovery(struct tcpcb *tp, struct tcphdr *th)
 {
 	INP_WLOCK_ASSERT(tptoinpcb(tp));
 
-	/* XXXLAS: KASSERT that we're in recovery? */
-
 	if (CC_ALGO(tp)->post_recovery != NULL) {
 		tp->t_ccv.curack = th->th_ack;
 		CC_ALGO(tp)->post_recovery(&tp->t_ccv);
 	}
-	/* XXXLAS: EXIT_RECOVERY ? */
+	EXIT_RECOVERY(tp->t_flags);
+
 	tp->t_bytes_acked = 0;
 	tp->sackhint.delivered_data = 0;
 	tp->sackhint.prr_delivered = 0;
@@ -2803,35 +2802,36 @@ resume_partialack:
 		 * If the congestion window was inflated to account
 		 * for the other side's cached packets, retract it.
 		 */
-		if (IN_FASTRECOVERY(tp->t_flags)) {
-			if (SEQ_LT(th->th_ack, tp->snd_recover)) {
-				if (tp->t_flags & TF_SACK_PERMIT)
-					if (V_tcp_do_prr && to.to_flags & TOF_SACK) {
-						tcp_timer_activate(tp, TT_REXMT, 0);
+		if (SEQ_LT(th->th_ack, tp->snd_recover)) {
+			if (IN_FASTRECOVERY(tp->t_flags)) {
+				if (tp->t_flags & TF_SACK_PERMIT) {
+					if (V_tcp_do_prr &&
+					    (to.to_flags & TOF_SACK)) {
+						tcp_timer_activate(tp,
+						    TT_REXMT, 0);
 						tp->t_rtttime = 0;
-						tcp_do_prr_ack(tp, th, &to, sack_changed);
+						tcp_do_prr_ack(tp, th, &to,
+						    sack_changed);
 						tp->t_flags |= TF_ACKNOW;
 						(void) tcp_output(tp);
-					} else
+					} else {
 						tcp_sack_partialack(tp, th);
-				else
+					}
+				} else {
 					tcp_newreno_partial_ack(tp, th);
-			} else
-				cc_post_recovery(tp, th);
-		} else if (IN_CONGRECOVERY(tp->t_flags)) {
-			if (SEQ_LT(th->th_ack, tp->snd_recover)) {
-				if (V_tcp_do_prr) {
-					tp->sackhint.delivered_data = BYTES_THIS_ACK(tp, th);
-					tp->snd_fack = th->th_ack;
-					/*
-					 * During ECN cwnd reduction
-					 * always use PRR-SSRB
-					 */
-					tcp_do_prr_ack(tp, th, &to, SACK_CHANGE);
-					(void) tcp_output(tp);
 				}
-			} else
-				cc_post_recovery(tp, th);
+			} else if (IN_CONGRECOVERY(tp->t_flags) &&
+				    (V_tcp_do_prr)) {
+				tp->sackhint.delivered_data =
+				    BYTES_THIS_ACK(tp, th);
+				tp->snd_fack = th->th_ack;
+				/*
+				 * During ECN cwnd reduction
+				 * always use PRR-SSRB
+				 */
+				tcp_do_prr_ack(tp, th, &to, SACK_CHANGE);
+				(void) tcp_output(tp);
+			}
 		}
 		/*
 		 * If we reach this point, ACK is not a duplicate,
@@ -2982,12 +2982,11 @@ process_ACK:
 		    SEQ_GT(tp->snd_una, tp->snd_recover) &&
 		    SEQ_LEQ(th->th_ack, tp->snd_recover))
 			tp->snd_recover = th->th_ack - 1;
-		/* XXXLAS: Can this be moved up into cc_post_recovery? */
+		tp->snd_una = th->th_ack;
 		if (IN_RECOVERY(tp->t_flags) &&
 		    SEQ_GEQ(th->th_ack, tp->snd_recover)) {
-			EXIT_RECOVERY(tp->t_flags);
+			cc_post_recovery(tp, th);
 		}
-		tp->snd_una = th->th_ack;
 		if (tp->t_flags & TF_SACK_PERMIT) {
 			if (SEQ_GT(tp->snd_una, tp->snd_recover))
 				tp->snd_recover = tp->snd_una;



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202402051141.415Bfmuw075444>