Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 07:31:01 +1100 From: "Joe Shevland" <joe.shevland@e-wise.com> To: "Greg Lewis" <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: RE: tomcat41 producing 28 java daemons Message-ID: <JDEJKBDPOMEJIPCEMEJFGENHCFAA.joe.shevland@e-wise.com> In-Reply-To: <20040319160929.GB2605@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I see, I didn't realize that, I thought the Linux JVM dealt with threads as 'light-threads' from a while back... but now I think I'm getting confused with Solaris :/ Sorry for any unnecessary noise, Regards, Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Lewis [mailto:glewis@eyesbeyond.com] > Sent: Saturday, 20 March 2004 3:09 AM > To: Joe Shevland > Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: tomcat41 producing 28 java daemons > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 10:47:31PM +1100, Joe Shevland wrote: > > > Yes. You see threads as processes for linux programs. > > > > Really, every Java spawned thread is a separate process with > the Linux JDK? > > (Or is that just how it appears?). Sorry, I shouldn't come out > of my lurker > > mode, but that must be expensive? > > Thats the case with Linux itself (unless you're using the new 2.6 kernel). > FreeBSD is just emulating behaviour. And yes, it was pretty heavy weight, > which is why its been replaced :). > > -- > Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com > Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com > Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?JDEJKBDPOMEJIPCEMEJFGENHCFAA.joe.shevland>