Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Jun 2001 21:35:17 +0400
From:      "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-standards@bostonradio.org
Subject:   Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat])
Message-ID:  <20010618213516.A7179@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <200106181722.NAA57757@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu on Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:22:10PM -0400
References:  <200106180149.f5I1nma09752@earth.backplane.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106181454450.6291-100000@besplex.bde.org> <200106181553.LAA56935@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20010618205944.A6595@nagual.pp.ru> <200106181722.NAA57757@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 13:22:10 -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> <<On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:59:45 +0400, "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> said:
> 
> > Maybe it is just my bad English understanding, but it seems last two cases
> > must be
> > 	./foo/		.//
> > 	./foo/bar	.//bar
> 
> No, because the ``resulting filename'' begins with a slash.

It seems resulting filename (pathname?) begins with "./" (not a slash).
I.e. I don't understand how "filename" can ever begin with "/", maybe they
means "pathname" instead? "/" is not valid _filename_ component.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010618213516.A7179>