Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 00:34:25 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Patrick Tracanelli <eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/projects summerofcode.sgml Message-ID: <20050602203425.GA66858@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <429F50AB.4010106@freebsdbrasil.com.br> References: <200506021252.j52Cqfkl048746@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050602130847.GB64196@cell.sick.ru> <20050602153312.X21266@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <20050602172837.A29372@fledge.watson.org> <429F50AB.4010106@freebsdbrasil.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 03:32:11PM -0300, Patrick Tracanelli wrote: P> Robert Watson wrote: P> > P> >On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Harti Brandt wrote: P> > P> >>On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: P> >> P> >>GS>On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 12:52:40PM +0000, Murray Stokely wrote: P> >>GS>M> Modified files: P> >>GS>M> en/projects summerofcode.sgml P> >>GS>M> Log: P> >>GS>M> Add more detail to BSNMP item. List Philip Paeps and Robert P> >>Watson as P> >>GS>M> coordinators. P> >>GS> P> >>GS>Why isn't Hartmut here? I'd also like to be Cc'ed to BSNMP ideas, P> >>GS>although I can't promise a lot of activity on this. Is it possible? P> >> P> >>Hey, great idea. I wasn't reading this thread (kind of overload P> >>condition). Surely I can help out with mentoring/co-ordination. The P> >>only problem beeing that I'll be out of reachability for August (no P> >>connectivity in a small siberian town :-). P> > P> > P> >Expanding the support for SNMP monitoring of FreeBSD systems using our P> >native SNMP pieces is something I've had on my "Someday" todo list for P> >ages. I'd really like to see this happen (hence adding it to Murray's P> >list :-). Being able to claim that FreeBSD can be monitored out of the P> >box using SNMP (assuming an admin twiddle is set) would be quite useful P> >from a "make your embedded X out of FreeBSD" perspective. Especially if P> >it were easy to say "Let the interfaces be monitored", "Let the VM P> >system be monitored", "Let users be monitored" as configurable items so P> >(for example) firewall vendors could enable network interface monitoring P> >but not user monitoring. P> > P> >Robert N M Watson P> P> For embedded systems it would also be great if the native snmp could P> monitor ipfw pkts/bytes accounting just like an existing MIB/patch for P> ucd-snmp do; Would be even better if it could monitor PF accounting too. P> Today we work hard to fit ucd-snmp in a 32MB flash card using TinyBSD P> (www.tinybsd.org) just because of this patch instead of contrib/'s P> bsnmp. This snmp thing along with the firewall accounting MIBs is P> specially interesting for embedded wireless systems. We already have module for pf(4) monitoring. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050602203425.GA66858>