Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:39:33 -0800
From:      Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
To:        Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
Cc:        "Wafa M. Hadidi" <wmmh@identd.net>
Subject:   Re: Updating sparc64 time_t, hostname not found
Message-ID:  <20040319003933.GB62814@ns1.xcllnt.net>
In-Reply-To: <p0602043dbc7fde745c29@[128.113.24.47]>
References:  <40594A35.6060303@exeter.ac.uk> <200403190005.22811.wmmh@identd.net> <p0602043bbc7fce6c9a52@[128.113.24.47]> <200403190057.36638.wmmh@identd.net> <p0602043dbc7fde745c29@[128.113.24.47]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 06:35:44PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> 
> Re-check
>     grep __time_t /usr/src/sys/sparc64/include/_types.h
>
> (again) just to make sure it's 32-bit, and then redo the:

IIRC the source tree was synced, so I expect to see a 64-bit typedef.
If it's a 32-bit time_t, the source tree is not up-to-date. In that
case a whole lot of cans and worms (in various relations to each
other) enter the picture and the outcome of using that source tree
is pretty much undefined (from where I'm sitting).

-- 
 Marcel Moolenaar	  USPA: A-39004		 marcel@xcllnt.net



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040319003933.GB62814>