Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Sep 1996 23:57:26 -0700
From:      Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-gnu@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/x2p Makefile 
Message-ID:  <199609200657.XAA23239@precipice.shockwave.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 20 Sep 1996 10:20:45 %2B1000." <199609200020.KAA26783@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
But there's no reason to think that someone wouldn't put /usr/local/bin
first, which is tradition, and we have a (*^*&%^*& useless perl5 port that
overrides things.

  From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
  Subject: Re: cvs commit:  src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/x2p Makefile
  >  Branch:      gnu/usr.bin/perl/x2p  RELENG_2_1_0
  >  Modified:    gnu/usr.bin/perl/x2p  Makefile
  >  Log:
  >  Bring in:  Grab h2ph from /usr/bin, not /usr/local/bin! from head
  
  Er, it was grabbed from $PATH.  The standard PATH (in /root and in
  /usr/share/skel) has /usr/bin before /usr/local/bin, so there is no
  problem.  There is no reason to expect /usr/src to be buildable if
  $PATH is nonstandard.  (I used to compile with a local version of
  cc even when I didn't want to until I renamed it gcc.)
  
  Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609200657.XAA23239>