Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:54:09 -0500 From: Ryan Sommers <ryans@gamersimpact.com> To: Chris Hedley <cbh-freebsd-current@groups.chrishedley.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Crash with new bind/host cmds on -CURRENT (poss. runq_remove?) Message-ID: <4175C541.2080703@gamersimpact.com> In-Reply-To: <20041020023318.T866@teapot.cbhnet> References: <20041018202949.J866@teapot.cbhnet> <20041019160026.GB55255@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041019231815.GA7266@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041020003333.H866@teapot.cbhnet> <4175BABD.70602@gamersimpact.com> <20041020023318.T866@teapot.cbhnet>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris Hedley wrote: > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Ryan Sommers wrote: > >> Are you using PREEMPT with SHED_ULE? Or is this just SHED_ULE without >> preemption? > > > I have both SCHED_ULE and PREEMPTION set in my config file, which I've > included as an attachment "just in case" (please don't laugh at how > scruffy it's become!) Err, my fault for not looking at it. I would disable PREEMPT if you're going to use SCHED_ULE. It's known to be pretty unstable. If you want preemption I'd switch to SCHED_4BSD. -- Ryan Sommers ryans@gamersimpact.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4175C541.2080703>