Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 Dec 1998 23:13:26 +0200
From:      Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
To:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc.conf 
Message-ID:  <199812212113.XAA63667@greenpeace.grondar.za>
In-Reply-To: Your message of " Mon, 21 Dec 1998 12:12:17 PST." <199812212012.MAA47267@apollo.backplane.com> 
References:  <199812212012.MAA47267@apollo.backplane.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>     My estimate is that the sandbox would work just fine on 99% of the 
>     FreeBSD installations out there.  The basic problem is that Paul Vixie
>     doesn't take sandboxes seriously so he doesn't bother fixing the crappy
>     interface scanning or UDP binding code to allow the use of a single IP.
>     Instead, bind goes out of its way to fart around with interface scanning
>     and rescanning and all sorts of shit that it doesn't need to do.

The "sandbox" concept in Unix is quite badly flawed. Given that in
Java it is difficult enough to implement properly, trying to do it
in Unix is JA impossible. The next-best approach is to fix the
software, not break the OS.

M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812212113.XAA63667>