Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:24:25 -0500 From: =?UTF-8?B?6Z+T5a625qiZIEJpbGwgSGFja2Vy?= <askbill@conducive.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Wiki for discussing P35/IHC9(R)/SATA issues set up Message-ID: <473210E9.6000600@conducive.net> In-Reply-To: <20071107190032.GA1247@eos.sc1.parodius.com> References: <20071106153509.GB91218@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <47308E19.70507@samsco.org> <47315094.6080405@yandex.ru> <47315158.5090304@gmail.com> <4731A755.7060701@yandex.ru> <4731AEE8.70606@gmail.com> <4731AFA5.9090104@gmail.com> <20071107160212.GA31717@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <4731FC4E.6040209@deepcore.dk> <20071107183506.GA35809@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <20071107190032.GA1247@eos.sc1.parodius.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: *snip* > > Well, I *WAS* in the middle of about a 100 line Email, when our primary > production RELENG_6 box kernel panic'd. What's really upsetting me is > that the dump was written to swap, but savecore claims it couldn't find > any panics. > > Uptime: 133d3h3m31s <-- not too bad. > ..I've seen around 700 days with 4.8 on 450 MHz K6 before the single IBM Deskstar lunched its 5+ y.o. self a bit too badly to carry on. In either case, it mostly means we've gotten overly casual about updating and upgrading, though.. > Back to writing the mail from scratch... > Bet it will be half the size now. D'ya suppose kernels are becoming sentient? Lord knows enough love has been lavished on 'em.. ;-) Bill
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?473210E9.6000600>