Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 23:37:10 -0500 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/portlint Makefile Message-ID: <20060407043710.GA27402@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <1144384388.23833.0.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <200604070008.k370815D002659@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060407042854.GB27150@soaustin.net> <1144384388.23833.0.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:33:08AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > I thought we were waiting for Ade's libtool patch was was already > committed. I have seen numerous PRs about REINPLACE since then as well > as many relevant commits. Therefore, I saw no problem in doing > portlint. The idea I had was to do the USE_REINPLACE things as a small number of commits sweeping the entire tree, rather than N commits. I would think the commits are OK if you are already committing a PR anyway. I would also like to see as many of the 'update'-style PRs committed before we do that sweep, because after that the patches in many of those PRs are probably going to become stale. mclhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060407043710.GA27402>