Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 10:20:03 GMT From: Szilveszter Adam <sziszi@bsd.hu> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/129281: Audio CD ripping/duplication shouldn't recommend the use of non endianness safe dd/burncd commands Message-ID: <200811301020.mAUAK300030151@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/129281; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Szilveszter Adam <sziszi@bsd.hu> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: docs/129281: Audio CD ripping/duplication shouldn't recommend the use of non endianness safe dd/burncd commands Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 10:37:45 +0100 On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 09:04:14PM +0000, Yuri wrote: > My proposition: > Sub-section "ATAPI Drives" should be deleted. > Title of "SCSI Drives" should be changed to "SCSI/ATAPI Drives". > > ATAPI drives are exposed as SCSI devices so there should be no problem. I do not particularly care for the self-advertisement of Joerg for his own software, but at least the last sentence is not true. On FreeBSD, exposing ATAPI devices as SCSI is just a choice that the user is free to make (or not). The use of the atapicam module or kernel option is just that, entirely optional. Also, atapicam may have at least as many problems with particular hardware/software combinations as burncd, so YMMV. I for one use burncd and I am perfectly happy with it. Note: One other reason people used to prefer "cdrecord" was that it was a standard staple on linux, and so a lot of pretty GUI frontends were written for it that do little more than call cdrecord with the correct arguments. For me, this is not important, burning from the command line just works(TM). -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Budapest Hungary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200811301020.mAUAK300030151>