Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 30 Nov 2008 10:20:03 GMT
From:      Szilveszter Adam <sziszi@bsd.hu>
To:        freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: docs/129281: Audio CD ripping/duplication shouldn't recommend the use of non endianness safe dd/burncd commands
Message-ID:  <200811301020.mAUAK300030151@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/129281; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Szilveszter Adam <sziszi@bsd.hu>
To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: docs/129281: Audio CD ripping/duplication shouldn't recommend
	the use of non endianness safe dd/burncd commands
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 10:37:45 +0100

 On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 09:04:14PM +0000, Yuri wrote:
 > My proposition:
 > Sub-section "ATAPI Drives" should be deleted.
 > Title of "SCSI Drives" should be changed to "SCSI/ATAPI Drives".
 > 
 > ATAPI drives are exposed as SCSI devices so there should be no problem.
 
 I do not particularly care for the self-advertisement of Joerg for his
 own software, but at least the last sentence is not true. On FreeBSD,
 exposing ATAPI devices as SCSI is just a choice that the user is free to
 make (or not). The use of the atapicam module or kernel option is just
 that, entirely optional. Also, atapicam may have at least as many
 problems with particular hardware/software combinations as burncd, so
 YMMV. I for one use burncd and I am perfectly happy with it. 
 
 Note: One other reason people used to prefer "cdrecord" was that it was
 a standard staple on linux, and so a lot of pretty GUI frontends were
 written for it that do little more than call cdrecord with the correct
 arguments.  For me, this is not important, burning from the command line
 just works(TM).
 
 
 -- 
 Regards:
 
 Szilveszter ADAM
 Budapest
 Hungary



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200811301020.mAUAK300030151>