Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 07:27:15 -0600 From: Jamie Gritton <jamie@FreeBSD.org> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de>, freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset? Message-ID: <518BA433.6050605@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130509091738.GC4437@caravan.chchile.org> References: <511E61F5.1000805@omnilan.de> <511EC759.4060704@FreeBSD.org> <5121EC52.5040502@omnilan.de> <20130219212430.GA92116@felucia.tataz.chchile.org> <514B9EF6.3000607@quip.cz> <514BA14F.3090609@FreeBSD.org> <514BA3D9.5010901@quip.cz> <514BAA01.20402@FreeBSD.org> <20130509091738.GC4437@caravan.chchile.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/09/13 03:17, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:46:57PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote: >> >> It's not fixed anywhere yet - it sometimes works in current, and >> sometimes doesn't. I've been meaning to patch it up, but it the problem >> is what I think it is, the patching up is a pretty big operation. >> >> It doesn't mean you can't use jails with devfs in 9.1, just that you >> can't use them with jail.conf. The old jail rc file that's all >> shell-based is still the official jail startup method, and that one >> still works. So existing systems will still work as expected, hence no >> errata. > > Shouldn't we warn the user about that in the manpage though? Well really we ought to fix it. I guess the man page could have something in the meantime, about an assumption that when you specify a devfs ruleset, that the ruleset in question must actually exist at the time. - Jamie
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?518BA433.6050605>