Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:11:10 +0000 From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> To: Skip Ford <skip@menantico.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r214817 - head/sys/teken Message-ID: <20101105121110.GA95191@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20101105110244.GE72983@menantico.com> References: <201011050056.oA50uLk5078426@svn.freebsd.org> <20101105012103.GA26789@freebsd.org> <20101105072515.GA8725@lonesome.com> <20101105110244.GE72983@menantico.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri Nov 5 10, Skip Ford wrote: > Mark Linimon wrote: > > I'm always looking for suggestions on how we can get more committers > > interested in PRs (especially those with patches). > > For PRs with patches that apply to code with a listed MAINTAINER, that > maintainer should have to address the PR within 3 days or their own > commits should get blocked until they do. > > Maintainers will then either handle PRs, or stop listing themselves as > maintainers, which would open "their" code up to other committers to > commit without maintainer review. It's a win either way, IMO, as far as > handling PRs goes. *lol* that would be like polititians agreeing to have their salaries cut in half: NOT GOING TO HAPPEN! > > -- > Skip -- a13x
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101105121110.GA95191>