Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:46:09 -0500 From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: adding more ram Message-ID: <20031211024608.GA9086@ussenterprise.ufp.org> In-Reply-To: <2946E9F05C8DD511A7DC0002A5608CE4DB2018@gbchm201.exgb01.exch.eds.com> References: <2946E9F05C8DD511A7DC0002A5608CE4DB2018@gbchm201.exgb01.exch.eds.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
In a message written on Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 02:42:12AM -0000, Sparrevohn, Thomas wrote:
> The /var size should properly stay as recommended. But a sanity
> check on the available space when enabling crash dumps might be a
> good idea
Right, I didn't want to change the default suggestion, just put near
that recomendation that crash dumps may greatly increase /var need,
and also mention that in the swap sizing section as to why swap == ram
should probably be a minimum (otherwize you can't turn on crash dumps
without repartitioning).
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/19pwNh6mMG5yMTYRApqYAJsHGNfoOuP4nLxhxcfwWyevi1o73QCfb/yT
RBSTdXg0oM09cRrFUkFkOic=
=n9xm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031211024608.GA9086>