Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 Jul 1996 10:29:45 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans)
Cc:        rnordier@iafrica.com, terry@lambert.org, current@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: anyone working on upgrading the msdosfs to NetBSD levels?
Message-ID:  <199607311729.KAA02343@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <199607310837.SAA12179@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Jul 31, 96 06:37:27 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >All new FS's should expect to work on a "device" that is totally
> >committed to the FS and looks like it starts at offset 0, and return
> >EINVAL or EFAULT for out of range operations on the device.  If
> >this were there now, then the MSDOSFS would be incapable of
> >corrupting non-MSDOSFS disk areas with the current code.
> 
> It's always been there.  Broken code can only write outside the range
> by corrupting the device number.

The sd and od strategy rotutines do not error out.

I am not sure I trust dscheck() entirely (since corruption occurs).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607311729.KAA02343>