Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:36:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com> To: Tarc <tarc@tarc.po.cs.msu.su> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problem with TCP/IP stack? Message-ID: <20050610083517.P42933@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> In-Reply-To: <20050610102829.GA44456@tarc.po.cs.msu.su> References: <20050607172121.84552.qmail@web80606.mail.yahoo.com> <20050609172640.GA23269@tarc.po.cs.msu.su> <20050609135335.Q42933@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <20050610102829.GA44456@tarc.po.cs.msu.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Tarc wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 01:58:50PM -0400, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: >> On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Tarc wrote: >> >>> I have recompilled kernel and world, reboot and after enabling >>> 'log_in_vain' options see in logs a lot of following lines(with different >>> IPs). What happines? Is this is kernel or ocaml/mldonkey problem? >>> Connection attempt to TCP 158.250.16.33:60099 from 84.109.91.22:4662 >>> flags:0x12 >> >> That means that a connection attempt was made to local (presumably) port >> 60099 from host 84.109.91.22 using remote port 4662. > > Thanks, I know it. > >> log_in_vain is >> designed to spam the system log with these kinds of messages. > > /etc/defaults/rc.conf said in comment for 'log_in_vain '">=1 to log connects to ports w/o listeners." > so it's documentation bug? No, sir. What you saw logged is exactly what is documented. Andy /* Andre Guibert de Bruet * 6f43 6564 7020 656f 2e74 4220 7469 6a20 */ /* Code poet / Sysadmin * 636f 656b 2e79 5320 7379 6461 696d 2e6e */ /* GSM: +1 734 846 8758 * 5520 494e 2058 6c73 7565 6874 002e 0000 */ /* WWW: siliconlandmark.com * Tormenting bytes since 1980. */
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050610083517.P42933>