Date: Sun, 22 Feb 1998 23:17:47 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More breakage in -current as a result of header frobbing. Message-ID: <199802230617.XAA01148@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 22 Feb 1998 09:24:29 PST." <27201.888168269@time.cdrom.com> References: <27201.888168269@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <27201.888168269@time.cdrom.com> "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: : More to the point, it's far more damaging to alienate and potentially : lose an existing volunteer than it is to have the tree occasionally : broken, as much as I might whine about that from time to time. We : have to consider who we are and how we got here - this isn't : commercial software development, as much as we might sometimes try to : emulate it. :-) I hate to jump into the llama spitting that has been going on... personally, i don't have a problem with what has been going on. Ever since the make buildworld target came online, I don't care if tree is broken in -current from time to time. if people bust it and don't fix it in a timely better, then that is a problem. I've not seen that in -current at all. sure people are human and are in need of a pointy hat from time to time. if there is a person who has violated these tennants, i'd expect core to deal with it appropriately. this, after he or she has a long history of needing others to cleam up after them or not respecting the will of core. None of which is currently going on as best as I can tell (I'm not in core). I agree with jordan. I don't think there is a problem here. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802230617.XAA01148>