Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:49:06 -0400 From: Boris Kochergin <spawk@acm.poly.edu> To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem Message-ID: <48C00372.8030600@acm.poly.edu> In-Reply-To: <47C4FB54.FF2F89EF@kuzbass.ru> References: <47C428EC.3090909@acm.poly.edu> <20080226162307.GA80931@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <47C4439A.9050502@acm.poly.edu> <20080226175616.GC1509@heff.fud.org.nz> <47C4FB54.FF2F89EF@kuzbass.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> Eugene, I take it the fix that applies on Boris's case is the >> M_BCAST|M_MCAST setting on the mbuf? I would like to test/commit this. >> > > I see you have already got it :-) > > >> Also, why to you add support for adding a bridge to a lagg interface? >> > > I needed to force lagg(4) to aggregate two EtherIP tunnels and now > I have it working :-) > > Eugene > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Ahoy. I've been using the patch for a while, and, recently, when the load on the wireless network I needed it for has increased, I've started getting kernel panics that I think the patch is responsible for. The panics are usually foreshadowed by messages in the style of "Sep 3 11:34:14 unique kernel: delayed m_pullup, m->len: 22 off: 38333 p: 97" in the kernel buffer. I like to think that I've eliminated the possibility of bad hardware by changing the motherboard, memory, and Ethernet controllers in the machine, and have tried both Eugene's original patchset and the one that was committed to 7-STABLE, with the same ill effects. Any ideas about what might be wrong, or shall I set about getting a backtrace? Thanks. -Boris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48C00372.8030600>